How Snowflake rebuilt performance reviews without burning out its managers


Hi Reader,

Back in 2011, I canceled the annual performance reviews in my organization. They were painful for everyone, managers and employees, and they weren't adding much. Things moved so fast that by the time a manager and an employee sat down to talk, the goals were already out of date.

So we replaced the annual review with biweekly conversations between managers and their teams. A couple of years later, Deloitte wrote about it in its annual trends report as continuous performance management.

So I was interested to hear how David Gonzalez, Head of People Performance & Growth at Snowflake, rebuilt performance management for a company coming out of hypergrowth. We talked about it on this week's Built by People Leaders.

The problem David had to solve is one you probably know. Quarterly reviews load managers up with forms, ratings, and calibration when they're already stretched. So companies do them less often — and lose the one fixed moment a manager had for a real coaching and career talk. Take the reviews away, and that conversation goes too.

The Coaching Compass

The move is to keep the formal review light and add one thing in the quarters in between: a single fast read on each person — are they tracking ahead, on track, or off track?

That's the approach. It isn't a rating, and it never goes in a file. It's a signal — a compass — that points to where a conversation is needed. An "off track" or an "ahead" is the cue to sit down that same week for a coaching and career talk. The light quarters carry the coaching; the formal cycle carries the rating.

Why it works

Two reasons.

First, it separates the signal from the paperwork. You don't need a full rating cycle to notice that someone is drifting or pulling ahead — three states are enough to start the right conversation. Managers get a rhythm instead of a form.

Second, a trend shows up before a problem does. Someone flagged "off track" in a two-minute read gives you weeks to coach. Wait for the annual review and the same drift arrives as a resignation you can no longer reverse.

Try it this week

Take your team and, for each person, mark one of three against what their role needs this quarter: tracking ahead, on track, or off track.

Then, for anyone who lands on "ahead" or "off track," book twenty minutes this week for a coaching conversation. You can open it with:

"Here's the trend I'm seeing this quarter, and I wanted to talk about it early, while we can still do something with it. What's getting in your way — and what would the next stretch look like for you?"

You'll have started three real conversations before most companies have scheduled their next review cycle.

One line worth keeping

David's name for the signal captures the whole idea: "a coaching compass." A rating tells you where someone landed. A compass tells you where to go next.

The full episode has the rest of the architecture David built as Snowflake came out of hypergrowth: the four principles he designed everything around — clarity, accountability, advancement, and rewards — why he bakes the "how" of performance inside the rating instead of alongside it (where it always loses to the "what"), and how a fifty-person company with almost no data can still make sharp, data-driven people decisions. You can listen on your favorite platform.

YouTube

Listen →

Apple Podcast

Listen →

Spotify

Listen →

So tell me — in the quarters between your formal reviews, how does a manager on your team know someone is drifting? Hit reply; I read them.

Cheers, Daria


P.S. Know a People leader building something worth stealing? Send them my way — they might be my next guest.

Check out more of our work at...

Linkedin

Connect

Youtube

Subscribe

My book

Read

If you want to get in touch, hit REPLY.

I'm happy to help!

600 1st Ave, Ste 330 PMB 92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2246
Unsubscribe or Update your profile

Meaning Makers

A no-nonsense newsletter for busy leaders who are done with overwork and ready to scale smarter. Join a community of 15K+ leaders and followers across platforms getting concise, actionable insights on leadership, team building, and how to use AI and hybrid intelligence to make work easier—so you can earn more, go home earlier, and lead with purpose without burning out.

Read more from Meaning Makers

Hi Reader! Daria’s here. For most of my career, I pushed through. Whatever it cost. Merging 500 people in an M&A that closed in a few months. A full restructure. A major telecom rebrand. I got it done. Every time. And then I’d get sick. It took me years to realize that most things don’t fail during a crisis. They fail after it. We brace for the disruption, push through it, then treat the recovery as automatic. It isn’t. Decision quality drifts. Alignment loosens. And because the emergency is...

Hi Reader, What do you think the top AI use is in 2026? Harvard Business Review studied 12,637 real cases of people using AI. And the #1 is Therapy and companionship — same as 2025. The most common way people use AI is for their personal life. To talk something through. Across all 12,637 cases, we see three main scenarios. People use AI to think, to feel, and to work. To feel — they talk through stress, ask for relationship advice, or work out what a message from their boss really meant. To...

Hi Reader! When people start using AI at work, it changes things in three ways. You can do more of the same. More output, faster. And sometimes that's exactly what you need. You can get some time back and use it differently. Reflect, think, plan, strategize. Or just rest. Or you can redesign the work itself.When you redesign the work, the job itself becomes something different. A while back on my podcast, Greta Stahl — she runs organizational learning at Workday — told me how her team did...