The secret behind every team that scales


Hi Reader, Daria's here.

I was talking with Rachel Sutherland recently — she runs People and Operations at a company of about fifty, growing fast from a startup into a scaleup. And of course, we talked about the transition that comes easy to no leader.

You've heard plenty about the importance of delegation — "hire people smarter than you," the productivity math. But there's a part that makes it genuinely hard, and it isn't logistics. It's an identity shift.

You built something by being close to the work. By being the person everyone came to. Your judgment was the product. Then the company grows, and one day there is simply not enough time — and not enough of you — to be in every decision.

So you start handing decisions to other people. And two fears show up at once. One: what if they're not as good at this as I am? And the harder one: what if they're better at it than I am?

That second fear is the one nobody says out loud. It's also the sign you're doing it right.

Here’s the approach to walk leaders through when they’re in the middle of this.

1. Build a layer you can truly trust. Not a layer that reports to you — a layer you’d put real weight on. This is slow work, and no shortcut survives the growth.

Why it works: trust is the only thing that lets you release a decision without hovering over it, and hovering is what keeps you the bottleneck.

2. Brain-dump your context. All the reasoning living in your head — the history, the unwritten reasons, the “we tried that in 2023 and here’s what happened” — has to come out and get transferred.

Why it works: people can’t make decisions aligned with you if half the map only exists in your memory. As Rachel put it, you have to “brain dump a little bit onto them” so they’re genuinely aligned, not guessing.

3. Set up the process. Decide how decisions get made before you step back from making them — what gets escalated, what doesn’t, what “good” looks like.

Why it works: trust without structure produces confusion on a different level. Without it, Rachel says, decisions come back “nowhere near a decision I would make.”

4. Accept decisions you wouldn’t have made. As long as they serve the business. Not wrong decisions — different ones. Ones that hit the objective by a route you’d never have chosen.

Why it works: this is the step that makes the first three real. It’s also where most leaders reach back and reclaim the work.

That last point is where the whole thing tends to break. Most leaders are ok with delegating a task, but not judgment. They ask to be looped in “just this once,” and then always. And the layer they spent months building doesn’t decide anything.

I see a version of this constantly in my own work. Teams don't struggle because the people are incapable. They struggle because the structure amplifies the wrong behaviors — and a founder who can't release judgment is a structure. You become the bottleneck you're trying to design your way out of. (Read my latest Forbes Council article about this)

So this week, do one thing: stop trying to make every decision. Get clear on the one or two calls that still need you, and hand the rest to your team.

You don't lose the expert role when you do this. You outgrow it — again and again. Your job now is to name the most valuable thing you bring at this stage and let go of the rest.

YouTube

Listen →

Apple Podcast

Listen →

Spotify

Listen →

Rachel described it in our conversation: at a scaling company, you're "constantly reinventing yourself, or working yourself out of a job." That sounds exhausting. It's also freeing. If the version of you that was indispensable last year is redundant now, it means the company grew up around you. That was the goal.

See you next week.

Daria


P.S. Want to know how to hire for that level? Listen to this episode with John Pezoulas on hiring for startups and scaleups.

Check out more of our work at...

Linkedin

Connect

Youtube

Subscribe

My book

Read

If you want to get in touch, hit REPLY.

I'm happy to help!

600 1st Ave, Ste 330 PMB 92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2246
Unsubscribe or Update your profile

Meaning Makers

A no-nonsense newsletter for busy leaders who are done with overwork and ready to scale smarter. Join a community of 15K+ leaders and followers across platforms getting concise, actionable insights on leadership, team building, and how to use AI and hybrid intelligence to make work easier—so you can earn more, go home earlier, and lead with purpose without burning out.

Read more from Meaning Makers

Hi Reader, A few months ago, I sat with a senior engineering leader — sharp, self-aware, running a large org inside a big tech company — and walked him through his GC Index profile. He looked at his results for about a minute and went straight to the lowest number. Four scores high, one sitting at a 3. And he did what almost everyone does the first time. He pointed at the 3 and asked me how to fix it. I didn't answer that. It's the wrong question. The GC Index doesn't measure how good you are...

Hi Reader, Daria's here. And today I want to talk to you about communities. Honestly, I think it's one of the best ways to learn, grow, and connect. It is so valuable — and also so hard to build. It starts with real energy. People show up. And then, somewhere around week six, it goes quiet. We tend to blame ourselves for that. Maybe we didn't have enough passion or needed more follow-through. But enthusiasm and passion aren't really the problem. The missing part in most communities is...

Hi Reader, Last week I joined Todd Michaud on his podcast, the Work Intelligence Loop, alongside my partner from AI Leader's Compass, Giorgio Zampirolo. Partway through, we hit a question that turned into a bit of a debate. Who should own AI in an organization? Three of us had three different answers. Todd went first, and he was direct about it. The CEO is the Chief AI Officer — who else could it possibly be? If you lead the organization, AI adoption is your job. It's too big and too...